<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista is finally here&#8230; but Windows XP SP3 will be 4 years too late</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm</link>
	<description>get-info -class technology &#124; write-output > /dev/web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: markwilson.it [formerly known as Mark's (we)Blog] &#187; Windows service pack roadmap</title>
		<link>http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm#comment-56808</link>
		<dc:creator>markwilson.it [formerly known as Mark's (we)Blog] &#187; Windows service pack roadmap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markwilson.me.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm#comment-56808</guid>
		<description>[...] Regardless of this confusion around the different forms of update, service packs are not dead - far from it - with both Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP3 in beta at the time of writing. Although largely an update rollup, these service packs do introduce some new features (new networking features for XP, and a kernel change for Vista to bring it in line with Windows Server 2008) but I&#8217;ve been of the opinion for some time now that XP SP3 is long overdue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Regardless of this confusion around the different forms of update, service packs are not dead &#8211; far from it &#8211; with both Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP3 in beta at the time of writing. Although largely an update rollup, these service packs do introduce some new features (new networking features for XP, and a kernel change for Vista to bring it in line with Windows Server 2008) but I&#8217;ve been of the opinion for some time now that XP SP3 is long overdue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Why Windows Vista doesn&#8217;t mean that XP is dead (yet)</title>
		<link>http://www.markwilson.co.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark&#8217;s (we)Blog &#187; Why Windows Vista doesn&#8217;t mean that XP is dead (yet)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 08:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markwilson.me.uk/blog/2006/11/windows-vista-is-finally-here-but.htm#comment-747</guid>
		<description>[...] night, I wrote a post about how Windows Vista is finally here but that Windows XP users are long overdue a service pack. Well, having read it again in the cold light of day, I think I should add some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] night, I wrote a post about how Windows Vista is finally here but that Windows XP users are long overdue a service pack. Well, having read it again in the cold light of day, I think I should add some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
