Time to get creative!

Late last night, I wanted to write a blog post which quoted a portion of someone else’s copyrighted work. After researching fair use legislation (and finding out that the UK equivalent is fair dealing), it seemed that what I was doing constituted criticism, review and news reporting under the terms of fair dealing in the United Kingdom Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) but I was caught up in a haze of legal doubt. I made clear that I was not the originator of this work, credited the artists but even so I felt that I needed to disclaim my use of the work on the blog post and I’m no legal expert – what if I’ve got it all wrong? I’m not making vast sums of money from this blog and what if I get sued?

Whilst my problem related to copyrighted work and fair use/fair dealing is very vague, there is an answer for content publishers who do want to share their work – it’s been around for a while now and is really starting to get some traction – that answer is Creative Commons. I first heard about Creative Commons on an episode of TWiT a year or so back and when I recently redesigned this website, I turned it over to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License – effectively retaining some rights over the work whilst allowing others to use it in the manner that I see fit.

Basically, if anything is copyrighted (and under many jurisdictions it is automatically copyrighted – whether or not the © symbol is displayed) then permission is required to use it (subject to the vagaries of fair use/fair dealing). Creative Commons licenses are intended to make it easy to skip intermidiaries and to grant others permission to use creative works.

Creative Commons licenses are standard copyright licenses provided free of charge via the Internet. Written for lawyers and courts, they are translated for people, and again for computers. The are used to retain copyright whilst granting permission for certain uses, subject to some conditions (images are from Creative Commons):

AttributionAttribution. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your copyrighted work – and derivative works based upon it – but only if they give credit the way you request.
Noncommercial Noncommercial. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform your work – and derivative works based upon it – but for noncommercial purposes only.
No Derivative Works No Derivative Works. You let others copy, distribute, display, and perform only verbatim copies of your work, not derivative works based upon it.
Share Alike Share Alike. You allow others to distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs your work.

Any content may be protected with Creative Commons license, e.g. files, photos, drawings, websites, films, sounds, books, or weblogs – there is even a Creative Commons search engine.

To find out more, watch the video clip below:

Get creative!

My computer is better than your computer…

A couple of weeks back, I posted some clips of spoof Mac vs. PC ads, as well as pointing out that the Apple campaign is a little… how can I put this… untruthful… at times. I couldn’t be bothered to report Bill Gates getting annoyed on US television over the whole Mac vs. PC thing but I can tell this whole episode has gone mainstream when British comedians start poking fun at the Mac vs. PC ads on BBC Radio 4.

I was laughing out loud when I heard last Friday’s The Now Show – so much so that I thought I’d share a short segment of the show here – thereby illustrating that the whole “my operating system is better than your operating system” nonsense is quite ridiculous really:

Jon Holmes: Let’s take two letters at the same time…

Mac: Dear Jon, I’m a Mac.
PC: And I’m a PC.
Mac: I wonder if you could settle, once and for all, the controversial debate that’s been raging as to which one of us is better for the home and which one is better for the office?
PC: Well it really is a tricky one that, isn’t it? Umm.

Jon Holmes: But the Mac or PC argument has of course been a source of techie conflict for years; personally I couldn’t give less of a t*ss either way – they both let you download p*rn don’t they – what’s not to like? But speccy computer enthusiasts on either side treat the Mac and PC divide like open war…

(gunfire/explosions)

Admiral Horatio Nelson: The Battle is won Mr Hardy. Those Mac-loving scum have taken their stupid mouse that has only one clicky button and turned tail and fled. We can claim victory over those who would dare prefer an OS X operating system that utilises GUI and Unix underpinnings.

(explosion)

(Windows exclamation sound)

Arghh!

Admiral Horatio Nelson: Mr Hardy! I’ve been hit by a spam e-mail! I thought this ship’s Windows anti-worm and virus software had been configured to prevent unsolicited e-mails. I am done for.

Captain Thomas Hardy: Sorry Sir, the ship’s firewall was down. IT say there was a .DLL file error in the hold.

Admiral Horatio Nelson: It is over Mr Hardy. My battle is lost. Kiss me Hardy.

Captain Thomas Hardy: No thanks Sir, someone might film it on their phone camera and put it on YouTube and we’d look well gay.

Jon Holmes: PC or Mac, Mac or PC it’s causing a national divide pitching brother against brother, cousin against cousin, spoddy geek against spoddy geek…

Geek: At my signal, unleash Dell.

Jon Holmes: However, Mitchell and Webb aren’t the first double act to advertise computers either. Punt and Dennis did one some years ago, back when they were famous, in which they too had to pitch computer against computer but back then, there was no real contest as to which was the best…

Sinclair ZX-81: Hello, I’m a Sinclair ZX-81.
Space Invaders machine: And I’m a Space Invaders machine in the pub.
Sinclair ZX-81: I’ve got up to 1K of memory, an external cassette recorder (not supplied) and a lead to connect me to the back of the television.

(pause)

Space Invaders machine: Yeah but I’m in the pub.

Jon Holmes: No contest!

Notice
The above work has been copyrighted by the British Broadcasting Corporation and the author believes that the republishing of the script and low-quality recording on this page constitutes criticism, review and news reporting under the terms of fair dealing in the United Kingdom Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA). It also represents free publicity for one of the BBC’s excellent programmes!